Scope and inventory
Map the product, variants, releases, software components and available technical material.
Review firmware, software and updates to identify missing evidence and technical priorities for the CRA journey.
Map the product, variants, releases, software components and available technical material.
A baseline that makes components, libraries and the relationship between builds and product releases readable.
Review boot, hardening, interfaces, updates, signing, rollback, logs and vulnerability handling.
Define the product, versions, assessment boundaries, available material and technical stakeholders.
Review architecture, builds, components, interfaces, updates and lifecycle-management practices.
Identify technical gaps and order actions by risk, impact and feasibility.
Deliver the report, technical evidence and roadmap; where needed, start the priority work on firmware, software or infrastructure.
A new idea or an existing project? Tell us where you are starting from.
Open a topic to explore activities, technical choices and scope.
A requirements list is not enough unless it is connected to actual variants, versions, builds, components and procedures. The work starts from the product and produces a technical baseline that engineering, product teams and compliance specialists can use together.
The goal is not generic paperwork. It is to make the information needed to address technical gaps traceable. The level of detail is calibrated to the product, team maturity and available material.
Silicon LogiX does not issue certifications, CE markings, declarations of conformity or legal opinions. The manufacturer remains responsible for decisions and applicable obligations. We provide technical analysis and evidence that help teams work with quality functions, legal specialists and competent bodies where needed.
No. The service provides technical analysis, evidence and implementation work; it does not issue certifications, declarations of conformity or CE markings.
We can clarify the product’s technical perimeter and prepare information useful for assessment, but we do not provide a legally binding opinion. The manufacturer and qualified specialists remain responsible for that decision.
Yes. We start from available source code, builds, packages and components to create or normalize an SBOM linked to a specific release.
Yes. The assessment is designed to reconstruct components, builds, dependencies and risks even when documentation is incomplete.
There is no one-size-fits-all answer. The need and form of an intervention depend on the architecture, exposed surface, use scenario and expected lifecycle.
Yes. The scope can include the digital elements that affect security and product operation: device, embedded software, gateway, backend, dashboard and app.
Tell us your goal, what is already available and what needs to improve. We can then assess the next step together.